custom matlab program version 3.3 Search Results


90
MathWorks Inc easyspin version 5.2.33
Easyspin Version 5.2.33, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/easyspin version 5.2.33/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
easyspin version 5.2.33 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc custom matlab scripts r2015b
Custom Matlab Scripts R2015b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom matlab scripts r2015b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom matlab scripts r2015b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc dde23
Dde23, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dde23/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dde23 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc custom matlab software
Custom Matlab Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom matlab software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom matlab software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc fourth order adaptive runge–kutta scheme implemented in matlab's ode45
Fourth Order Adaptive Runge–Kutta Scheme Implemented In Matlab's Ode45, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fourth order adaptive runge–kutta scheme implemented in matlab's ode45/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fourth order adaptive runge–kutta scheme implemented in matlab's ode45 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc dijkstra
Dijkstra, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/dijkstra/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
dijkstra - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
MathWorks Inc lfp frequency bands
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Lfp Frequency Bands, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lfp frequency bands/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lfp frequency bands - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc voicebox for matlab
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Voicebox For Matlab, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/voicebox for matlab/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
voicebox for matlab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc graphical user interface (gui) development environment
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Graphical User Interface (Gui) Development Environment, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/graphical user interface (gui) development environment/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
graphical user interface (gui) development environment - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc ode15s solver
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Ode15s Solver, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ode15s solver/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ode15s solver - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab function detrend
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Matlab Function Detrend, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab function detrend/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab function detrend - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc single-threaded matlab implementation
Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and <t>LFP</t> features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the <t>LFP</t> <t>frequency</t> bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Single Threaded Matlab Implementation, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/single-threaded matlab implementation/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
single-threaded matlab implementation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and LFP features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the LFP frequency bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Journal: APL Bioengineering

Article Title: Degradation-aware neural imputation: Advancing decoding stability in brain machine interfaces

doi: 10.1063/5.0250296

Figure Lengend Snippet: Contribution ratio ( % Contribution ) of MUA and LFP features in predicting forelimb movement velocities along the x- and y-axes during the baseline period (recording days 1–7). (a) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the x-axis. (b) Contribution ratios of neural features for predicting forelimb movement velocity along the y-axis. Each subplot displays the % Contribution of MUA and LFP features for a specific rat ( Rat #4 , #6 , #9 , and #10 ) using the kSIR neural decoder. The contribution ratios of MUA features are shown individually for each channel (labeled 1–8), while the contribution ratios of LFP features are accumulated for each frequency band ( δ , θ , α , β , γ , and γ ′ ) across all channels. MUA features from each channel show the highest contribution in predicting both x- and y-velocity components compared to LFP power. Among the LFP frequency bands, the γ and γ ′ and exhibit higher contribution ratios, indicating their relevance in decoding forelimb movements. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Article Snippet: Frequency-spectrum features were widely used for processing LFPs; therefore, LFP raw data were further down-sampled to a 1-kHz sampling rate and converted to power spectral density using a short-time Fourier transform with a Hanning window of 1 f m ms in length and time step of 33-ms, where f m is the minimum frequency of each LFP frequency bands (using the spectrogram function from the Signal Processing Toolbox, MATLAB R2019a, MathWorks).

Techniques: Labeling